Informed Consent

When involving human subjects in research, the subjects must be able to choose what happens to them. The informed consent process facilitates this dialogue, and involves three key features: 

  1. Disclosing to potential research subjects information needed to make an informed decision; 
  2. Facilitating the understanding of what has been disclosed; and 
  3. Promoting the voluntariness of the decision about whether or not to participate in the research. 

Informed consent must be legally effective and prospectively obtained.

The elements of informed consent (paraphrased below) can be found in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) regulations under 45 CFR 46.116. The DHHS Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) also publishes Guidance and FAQs and on informed consent.

General requirements for informed consent
  • Informed consent should be obtained from the subject or the subject’s legally authorized representative (LAR) prior to involvement in research.
  • Subjects should be given appropriate time to consider and discuss their involvement research before making a decision. 
  • Investigators should minimize the possibility of coercion or undue influence on a subject’s choice of participation. 
  • Information given to the subject must be in a language they understand. 
  • The information given to the subject should include information that a reasonable person would want to have in order to make an informed decision. 
  • Informed consent must begin with a concise and focused presentation of the key information, presented in a way that is easy to understand.
  • Informed consent may not include language indicating that the subject is waiving their legal rights or language that in any way releases the investigator, sponsor, institution or other involved agents from liability or negligence.
Basic elements of informed consent
  • A statement that the study involves research.
  • Explanation of the study purpose.
  • Study duration.
  • Description of procedures.
  • Indication whether any procedures are experimental.
  • Foreseeable risks or discomforts.
  • Benefits.
  • Appropriate alternative procedures or courses of treatment, if any.
  • How confidentiality of records will be maintained.
  • For research involving more than minimal risk, an explanation as to whether any medical treatments are available if injury occurs.
  • Contact information in case there are questions.
  • Contact information in the event of a research-related injury.
  • A statement that participation is voluntary.
  • A statement that deciding to not participate will involve no penalty or loss of benefits to which the subject is otherwise entitled.
  • A statement that the subject may stop participation at any time.
  • One of the following statements:
    • Once identifiers are removed, data may be used for future research studies or distributed to another investigator for future research studies without additional informed consent.
    • That the subject’s data collected as part of the research will not be used or distributed for future research studies, even if identifiers are removed.
Additional elements of informed consent

The following statements should be used when appropriate: 

  • A particular treatment or procedure may involve risks to the subject that are unforeseeable.
  • Reasons why the subject’s participation may be terminated by the investigator.
  • Additional costs to the subject.
  • The consequences of a subject’s decision to withdraw. 
  • A statement that significant new findings may affect the subject’s willingness to continue. 
  • Whether the subject’s biospecimens (even if identifiers are removed) may be used for commercial profit and whether the subject will share in this commercial profit.
  • Whether clinically relevant research results will be disclosed to subjects.
  • Whether the research will or might include whole genome sequencing.
Parent/guardian permission

For human subjects research that includes minors as subjects, permission from parent(s) or legal guardian(s) should be addressed. The IRB may determine that permission from just one guardian is sufficient. 

Child or adolescent assent

For human subjects research that includes minors as subjects, “consent” cannot be obtained since these individuals are not of age to provide consent. Instead, child or adolescent agreement to participate (child or adolescent assent) should be addressed. Investigators should focus on describing the consent requirements in a way that minors fully understand. This is especially relevant in studies that may cause discomfort or are unlikely to provide direct benefit to subjects, since it may be challenging for minors to weigh possible societal benefits of research.

Suggested guidelines:

Age 6-7

A short verbal description of the research (in simple terms) is given to the child, with a focus on what participation will include.  The child can then indicate their verbal agreement or disagreement. This procedure may be documented on the informed consent form by the presence of an adult witness.

Age 8-12

A more complete verbal description of the research (in simple terms) is given to the child.  The child can then indicate their verbal agreement or disagreement.This procedure may be documented on the informed consent form by the presence of an adult witness. 

Age 13 – 17

Written agreement should be requested from the minor, using age-appropriate language.

Consent form templates

Consent form templates can be found on Human Subjects Research Forms and Templates.

Documentation of informed consent

Informed consent should be documented using an IRB-approved consent form. This documentation can be signed by the subject or their LAR with wet ink or electronically using a UC Santa Cruz DocuSign account. A copy must be given to the person signing the informed consent form. The investigators must keep signed consent forms according to the UCSC IRB Policy on Records Retention.

DocuSign limitations
  • DocuSign is not a system of record retention. All documents are purged every 90 days. Study team members are responsible for ensuring documents are stored in a manner consistent with the UCSC IRB Policy on Records Retention, the university’s Record Retention Policy and their own departmental requirements. 
  • UC Santa Cruz’s implementation of DocuSign does not meet the needs for FDA regulated research under 21 CFR Part 11. Human subjects research studies that are FDA-regulated cannot use DocuSign.
  • DocuSign cannot be used in research that is subject to International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR). 
  • DocuSign cannot be used to document the handling or transporting of hazardous or toxic materials.
  • DocuSign cannot be used for court orders, notices, or other official court documents.
  • Consult with the UC Santa Cruz Office of Campus Counsel for international agreements.
Waiver of documentation of informed consent

The IRB may waive the requirement for the investigator to obtain a signed consent form for some or all subjects if it finds that:

  • The research presents no more than minimal risk and involves no procedures for which written consent is normally required outside the research context.
  • Consent document would be the only record linking the subject to the research and the principal risk to the subject is the potential harm resulting from a breach of confidentiality.
  • The study subjects are members of a distinct cultural group or community in which signing forms is not the norm, the research presents no more than minimal risk of harm to subjects and there is an appropriate alternative mechanism for documenting that informed consent was obtained.

In cases in which the requirement for documentation of consent is waived, the IRB may require the investigator to provide subjects or LARs with a written statement regarding the research. 

Waiver or alteration of informed consent

The IRB may waive the requirements to obtain informed consent altogether or may approve a consent procedure which does not include all of the elements of informed consent. To do so, all of the following must be true and indicated explicitly in the IRB submission: 

  • The research involves no more than minimal risk to the subjects;
  • The waiver or alteration will not adversely affect the rights and welfare of the subjects;
  • If the research involves using identifiable private information or identifiable biospecimens, the research could not practicably be carried out without using such information or biospecimens in an identifiable format;
    • The waiver or alteration will not adversely affect the rights and welfare of the subjects; and
    • Whenever appropriate, the subjects or LARs will be provided with additional pertinent information after participation.

Although not usually applicable at UC Santa Cruz, for research involving public benefit and service programs conducted by or subject to the approval of state or local officials, the IRB may grant a waiver if:

  • The research or demonstration project is to be conducted by or subject to the approval of state or local government officials and is designed to study, evaluate, or otherwise examine:
  • Public benefit or service programs;
  • Procedures for obtaining benefits or services under those programs;
  • Possible changes in or alternatives to those programs or procedures; or
  • Possible changes in methods or levels of payment for benefits or services under those programs; and
  • The research could not practicably be carried out without the waiver or alteration.
Consent readability, literacy level, and translation

Federal regulations require that informed consent information be presented in language understandable to the subject. Consent language should include only layperson language, and should be at or lower than an eighth grade reading level. Exceptions can be made if appropriate, based on subject populations (e.g. a study involving only interviews with university faculty). In addition, researchers are required to provide consent language appropriately translated if subjects are not fluent in English. For studies that involve greater than minimal risk (typically those requiring full committee review), a professional or certified translation may be required. 

Decisional capacity and surrogate consent
Decisional capacity assessment

Individuals agreeing to participate in research must have adequate decision-making capacity. Investigators can use several procedures to allow those with decisional capacity impairment to make voluntary and informed decisions about their participation in research. Potential measures include repetitive teaching, audiovisual presentations, and verbal or written recall tests. Other measures might be follow-up questions to assess subject understanding, use of recorded conversations related to consent, or obtaining consent from a trusted family member or friend in the disclosure and decision-making process.

A sample Decisional Capacity Assessment tool is available for use. This tool requests responses from potential subjects to a series of questions that will demonstrate the subject’s capacity to understand the study’s goals, risks, benefits, and decision to participate.

Surrogate consent

If a decisional capacity assessment determines that an individual is unable to give their agreement to participate, surrogate consent must be obtained from the subject’s LAR such as a parent or guardian. The investigator should seek such consent only under circumstances that give the prospective subject and the representative sufficient consideration opportunity and should avoid the possibility of coercion or undue influence. 

Investigators must determine whether use of surrogate consent is appropriate. Consistent with state law, the IRB uses the following criteria when determining whether to permit the use of surrogate consent for participation in a research study:

  • Surrogate consent may be permitted by the IRB only in research studies relating to the cognitive impairment, lack of capacity, or serious or life-threatening diseases and conditions of the subjects.
  • The investigator must include a rationale for the use of surrogate consent.
  • There must be a protocol-specific plan for the sequence of steps that will be employed by the investigators to acquire and document surrogate consent provided by a LAR. The investigators must include a description of this plan and provide details of how the decision making capacity of subjects will be assessed and by whom.
Obtaining surrogate consent

Investigators must ensure that the surrogate will be willing to undertake on-going responsibilities associated with surrogate consent. The Self-Certification of Surrogate Decision Makers for Participation in Research form is completed by the surrogate as an attachment to the informed consent document. It verifies the willingness of the person to serve as a surrogate, describes the relationship of the surrogate to the subject and the surrogate’s qualifications demonstrating “reasonable knowledge” of the subject. Investigators must give a copy of the form, along with a copy of the consent, to the surrogate and keep the signed forms in the study records. 

Potential surrogates must be advised that if a higher-ranking surrogate is identified at any time, the investigator will defer to the higher-ranking surrogate’s decision regarding the subject’s participation in the research. If the potential surrogate identifies a person of a higher degree of surrogacy, the investigator is responsible to contact such individuals to determine if they want to serve as surrogate.

Surrogates are prohibited from receiving any financial compensation for providing consent. This does not prohibit the surrogate from being reimbursed for expenses the surrogate may incur related to the surrogate’s participation in the research.

Important notes:

  • When the IRB approves surrogate consent for a protocol, it is with the understanding that whenever possible investigators will attempt to obtain informed consent directly from the subjects
  • A re-consenting process may be necessary for those with fluctuating decision making capacity or those with decreasing capacity to give consent. 
  • Third party consent monitors may also be used during the recruitment and consenting process
  • Waiting periods may be required to allow more time for the subject to consider the information that has been presented.
  • Surrogate consent to participate is not permitted for persons in a State of California mental health facility inpatient psychiatric ward, or persons on psychiatric hold.
  • Modification requests to add cognitively impaired or medically incapacitated populations or surrogate consent is considered a significant change to the protocol.

For more information see the UC Office of the President (UCOP) Guidance on Surrogate Consent for Research.

Last modified: May 01, 2024